Sometimes I feel a bit like an outsider, being the only one among my long-time friends who doesn't own a home. "You're throwing your money away," they say with a mix of alarm and self-satisfaction. In response I shove my hands in my pockets and kick the dirt a little bit, mumbling something about not having to pay for a new roof and being able to call the landlord when the toilet breaks.
Then I read a recent story in The New York Times by David Leonhardt, which seemed to give me hope—or at least something better to say when I felt the need to defend my status as a renter:
"The case for renting has been simple enough. House prices rose so high in the first half of this decade that you could often get more for your money by renting," he writes. "Renting involves one obvious, recurring cost that can never be recouped: the monthly rent check. Buying, on the other hand, involves multiple expenses, some of which aren’t so obvious. On top of closing costs, there are repairs, property taxes, mortgage principal and mortgage interest. (The mortgage-interest tax deduction reduces this last cost but doesn’t eliminate it.) When you own, you also lose the ability to invest your down payment elsewhere, like the stock market."
So there! I thought. Take that, you smug owner-people!
But then I read on. Turns out, after so many years as a rental evangelist, Leonhardt has changed his mind. He has gone to the buying side.
Read about his conversion here.